As athletes, coaches and sport scientists we are interested in any factors that can speed up skill acquisition. Contextual interference is one factor that has been shown to accelerate motor learning. In this article we’ll explain contextual interference, discuss how you can apply it in practice and explore the theory behind this effect.
What is contextual interference?
Contextual interference involves mixing up your practice structure, either by adding different tasks and/or adding practice variability when learning a skill. The contextual interference effect shows that this interference results in worse practice performance, but a greater ability to retain and transfer skill at a later date.
This effect was first seen during a word learning task in the 1960s, and was further demonstrated when learning movements in the late 1970s. You can find a full historic review of the contextual interference effect here.
Why is the contextual interference effect useful?
This effect is counterintuitive, as we tend to associate better practice performance with athletes learning more. Whereas, the contextual interference effect tells us that this may not always be the case. By adding in more practice variability, we challenge the athlete, they make more errors, but this seems to create a longer lasting change in performance (increased learning).
What is contextual interferences & practice variability?
Here is where both students and coaches can get confused. There are two continuums along which we can add practice variability and contextual interference (CI) into our practice. Historically, this small detail hasn’t been explained very well in the literature.
The classic CI effect involves adding in new tasks to practice. We call this scale blocked to random practice. In the example below, we’ll use a footballer practicing her throw ins.
Blocked practice (bottom left corner) would be her completing 20 throw ins in a row, this practice would be deemed to have no contextual interference. As we move up the left hand side we are adding in different tasks. An example would be 20 throw ins, 20 passes and 20 sprints all carried out in a random order (top left corner). This would be called random practice and be considered to have higher levels of contextual interference.
The second scale sees us move left to right across our grid, from constant to varied practice. If we are being pedantic we could call this adding practice variability, but CI studies seem to use this continuum too for exploring the CI effect.
In the bottom left corner our footballer would be practicing all her throw ins to the same target, we call this constant practice. As we move to the right we can add variability into the task, one example would be to vary the distance of her target, but we could vary direction too. We would call this varied practice.
Using this grid you can start to see that we can describe practice using both these scales:
- Blocked – constant practice (bottom left)
- Blocked – random practice (top left)
- Varied – constant practice (bottom right)
- Varied – random practice (top right)
It is important to note that, in reality, these are sliding scales, rather than four separate types of practice. However, understanding how to manipulate practice along these two scales can be very useful as a coach and athlete.
Both, adding in random practice and adding in varied practice have been used to explore contextual interference effect in sport. As the grid shows, the bottom left corner has the least CI, then the more we move up and right, the more contextual interference we have within our practice structure.
What is optimal for learning?
It should be noted that the majority of the research has taken place with beginners learning simple, closed skills and despite results being statistically significant, some researchers have questioned the effect size and usefulness of such findings.
Despite the disagreement, there is consistent evidence that contextual interference improves the rate at which beginners learn tasks. One of the most useful recent papers showed that systematically increasing contextual interference with beginners outperformed both blocked and varied practice.
This finding suggests that we should start coaching beginners using constant-blocked practice, then slowly introduce more varied or random practice as they progress.
What causes the contextual interference effect?
Historically, the contextual interference effect has been explained from a cognitive standpoint. Every sports task requires a level of understanding and planning. By mixing up tasks during practice the athlete has to plan, forget and re-plan each time, this is not required when carrying out the same task over and over again (constant-blocked practice). This theory is called the forgetting-reconstruction hypothesis.
A similar, but slightly differing theory is called the elaboration hypothesis. Whereby mixing up tasks creates more distinctive memories between reps and induces better retention in our long term working memory. Some studies have attempted to confirm these theories using electrophysiology data, but there is some way to go before we properly understand the neural workings behind this behavioural effect.
Check out this chapter for more around theoretical underpinnings and contemporary issues surrounding the contextual interference effect.
Summarising contextual interference
Based on the evidence to date, it appears practice variability can result in slightly worse practice performance, but better retention and transfer of sporting skill. There is further evidence to indicate systematically increasing contextual interference could be the best approach when coaching beginners.
The size of the effect is still under debate and there is still limited data on this effect within elite performers. Further research is also needed to understand the neural working that underpins the contextual interference effect.
For more insights into practice structure check out this article on massed vs distributed practice.
Further reading
- Brady (2008) The contextual interference effect and sport skills
- Farrow & Buszard (2017) Exploring the applicability of the contextual interference effect in sports practice
- Lin et al. (2008) Contextual interference effect: elaborative processing or forgetting-reconstruction? A post hoc analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced effects on motor learning
- Magill & Hall (1990) A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition
- Porter & Magill (2010) Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills
Page Reference
If you quote information from this page in your work, then the reference for this page is:
- Shaw, W (2021). Contextual Interference Effect Explained. Available from: https://sportscienceinsider.com/contextual-interference-effect. [Accessed dd/mm/yyyy].
Will is a sport scientist and golf professional who specialises in motor control and motor learning. Will lecturers part-time in motor control and biomechanics, runs Golf Insider UK and consults elite athletes who are interested in optimising their training and performance.